Today, I read the editorial of a small-town newspaper. This time, the editor managed todeny the Holocaust, support white supremacy, make a racist statement towards Obama, make another general racist statement, bash the GLBT community, mock lesbians in specific a second time, make an anti-Semitic comment, and label television, radio, and teen magazines as evil.
Wow. Where does one even start with that? He should get a ribbon just for the insurmountable level of hatred in one article. After much cursing with a ftm Jewish friend over it all, I still find myself unsure of what exactly to say except to just scream–maybe not even profanities, but to just scream.
Behind the screams, I wonder where his hatred began. Where did he learn to hate? In discussing this with my friend, he suggested that the way someone was raised decided who someone hated and the level of this hatred. But what if the aforementioned hateful prick was the brother of someone who protested for peace and justice in the world? What if the sister of a evangelical fundamentalist hell-and-brimstone preacher was a Quaker who wanted to dedicate her life to helping others? How could one family produce such radically different offspring? Also, if they sold tickets to Thanksgiving dinner, would anyone show for the epic battle of the millennia? (Hey, you have to think of these things in a commercialistic society.)
What determines whether someone will decide to hate or to love his or her fellow man? I think the way one is raised most definitely has something to do with it. If your parents are hateful, you will be raised hearing their beliefs. If you’re raised in a culture in which everyone you’re exposed to hates the same people as your family, it stands to reason that you will be more likely to adopt the hatreds of the people around you than to go against all that you have known. In my examinations of human nature, I’ve found that people often go for what’s easiest. But why is hating others easiest, and, if hate is easiest, why would someone ever choose what is easy?
Yes, that editor is my brother. I once asked my mother where he learned to be so hateful and she transferred blame onto the public school district. Yet, I attended public school until seventh grade, and I am the polar opposite of my brother. If I were to ask the public school district in question, the finger-pointing would only continue to everyone but ourselves. I think all hate can be boiled down to fear, ignorance, and insecurity. After all, if one’s hatred continues to oppress another group into the position of second-class citizenry, that person can feel somehow superior. When things go wrong in his or her own life, the hateful person can try to assure him- or herself that at least s/he’s still better than x. But, is s/he, really? If someone’s entire existence revolves upon the hatred and oppression of others, how can this person ever be at all superior in quality? Worse yet is when such a hateful person is a preacher and spreads his/her hatreds upon a greater population through a position of influence or power. A religious group gives the hateful person a place to act out disparities to create women as a lesser sex dependent upon men or to limit other races joining a group, such as the Mormons did until the 1970s.
A quote from my brother’s editorial:
Why are homosexual groups allowed to go into public schools to entice your children into experimenting with their lifestyle and why are you labeled a ‘homophobe’ for objecting to it? Thankfully, we live in an area where there doesn’t occur–but folks, it’s closer than you think and the wolf will be on the door someday. Be vigilant and watch what your children are being exposed to. Turn off the TV every chance you get. The same goes for the radio.
I’m sorry, but people interested in fucking your children are called “pedophiles,” and they’re usually straight white males. Also, please spare me the Biblical imagery of the devil (“Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.” – 1 Peter 5:8). I’m afraid the “wolf” idea goes back to Little Red Riding Hood. Congratulations for getting that mixed up with the Bible, though. As for turning off the tv, I would agree–most especially for your own children, as they’re in dire need of literacy.
Why is lesbianism become the ‘in’ thing for so many young girls today? The sodomite deathstyle is revolting. Whatever happened to the days when one could look at Romans Chapter 1 and see that it is forbidden?
Yes, you see, because everyone wants to be a persecuted minority. Also, thank you for quoting Romans 1, which refers not to loving gay relationships, but pagan orgies. Thank you for not taking that completely out-of-context. Also, sodomy is a very vague word most successfully translated to refer to bestiality, so thank you for also not taking that out of context, either. Also, I’m pretty sure anyone with eyes can “look” at Romans 1. Just saying.
Why are those standing up for white rights branded ‘white supremacists’ and ‘racists’ while others are always called civil rights activists regardless of how blatantly hateful behave? [sic] I really don’t like listening to anyone gripe about their rights, but really, what is the difference?
The difference is that civil rights are for everyone, you idiot. The difference is that civil rights activists don’t emphasize one race over another because doing this is racist, as you so wonderfully demonstrated by your ignorance.
Recent Comments